I also believe in precentralization distraction as a means to make the centralization procedure easier. http://congenitalhand.wustl.edu/2012/05/fixator-for-radial-longitudinal.html And I definitely believe in pollicization (making a thumb). http://congenitalhand.wustl.edu/2013/09/more-thoughts-on-pollicization.html
However, there is no "one size fits all" solution for children with radial longitudinal deficiency. Some mildly affected kids may need therapy only or a tendon transfer only to balance the wrist. The thumbs may be reconstructed rather than treated with pollicization. And centralization is not always the right choice. For example, in kids with poor elbow motion (fortunately, this is rare in radial deficiency), centralizing the wrist can take the hand away from the mouth if the elbow doesn't move- bad idea.
I think this video is an amazing example of a child who makes us think about our normal treatment plans for radial longitudinal deficiency and what might be best for this particular child. Watch the child function. The wrists are markedly radially deviated but his hands are working straight ahead. This is because the ring and small fingers are the digits that work best for him (amazing dexterity). The thumb does not work at all and the index and long finger are limited. When considering these facts, the typical treatment of centralization of the wrist and then pollicization of the index finger into a position of a thumb might not make sense. This is because
1) Centralization takes the vital ring and small fingers out of the best position and makes them lie further away from where they are needed (i.e., more ulnar).
2) Pollicization outcomes depend on the quality of the index finger. In this case, the index finger is not great and therefore when pollicized, it will not make a great thumb.
Therefore treatment for this child has to be carefully considered. There are options but the best ones might be different from the typical "protocol."
Thank you to mom for allowing us to post this video.